<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Coup d&#039;Oeil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toderash.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toderash.net</link>
	<description>No box.  Just thinking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:44:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marketing Soft Drinks for Infants by brad/futuristguy</title>
		<link>http://toderash.net/2011/marketing-soft-drinks-for-infants/comment-page-1/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>brad/futuristguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toderash.net/?p=1099#comment-823</guid>
		<description>Click and see ... their teeth had already fallen out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click and see … their teeth had already fallen out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Darker Side of Steve Jobs by Brent Toderash</title>
		<link>http://toderash.net/2011/the-darker-side-of-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toderash.net/?p=1107#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Yes, good observation. I&#039;m certain Apple wouldn&#039;t be as strong without the command-and-control model... this is what made them more valuable than even Microsoft and Intel.

Maybe I have a problem with pop culture... ;^)  Open culture does indie much better than pop.

Apple&#039;s gamble is based on scarcity, and in today&#039;s tech climate, they have to artificially ensure scarcity through control. Seems a tenuous bet, but it&#039;s worked very well for them thus far.

It&#039;ll be interesting to watch it unfold... apparently Steve left about four years&#039; worth of product releases in the pipeline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, good observation. I’m certain Apple wouldn’t be as strong without the command-and-control model… this is what made them more valuable than even Microsoft and Intel.</p>
<p>Maybe I have a problem with pop culture… ;^)  Open culture does indie much better than pop.</p>
<p>Apple’s gamble is based on scarcity, and in today’s tech climate, they have to artificially ensure scarcity through control. Seems a tenuous bet, but it’s worked very well for them thus far.</p>
<p>It’ll be interesting to watch it unfold… apparently Steve left about four years’ worth of product releases in the pipeline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Darker Side of Steve Jobs by Jonathan Stewart</title>
		<link>http://toderash.net/2011/the-darker-side-of-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toderash.net/?p=1107#comment-819</guid>
		<description>Apple is very closed, very controlling.

But i wonder if they could have had the success they&#039;ve had without that. The consumer WANTS big record company music.  So Apple installed locks to satisfy them. The consumer WANTS big media movies and TV.  So Apple delivered.

The biggest problem the Open people have is they can never deliver pop culture, because pop culture is thoroughly sold out.

So Apple makes pop culture devices, and makes them VERY WELL. But is maybe the problem pop culture firstly, and Apple just being a well-running part of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is very closed, very controlling.</p>
<p>But i wonder if they could have had the success they’ve had without that. The consumer WANTS big record company music.  So Apple installed locks to satisfy them. The consumer WANTS big media movies and TV.  So Apple delivered.</p>
<p>The biggest problem the Open people have is they can never deliver pop culture, because pop culture is thoroughly sold out.</p>
<p>So Apple makes pop culture devices, and makes them VERY WELL. But is maybe the problem pop culture firstly, and Apple just being a well-running part of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Media ROI &amp; Unicorn Mortality by - Coup d&#039;Oeil</title>
		<link>http://toderash.net/2011/social-media-roi-unicorn-mortality/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>- Coup d&#039;Oeil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toderash.net/wp3/?p=1020#comment-796</guid>
		<description>[...] from social media will mean the social media efforts won’t be effec­tive. To be clear, as I went on to say in my post last week, I’m not sug­gest­ing that social media efforts not be mon­i­tored. What I wrote was that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] from social media will mean the social media efforts won’t be effec­tive. To be clear, as I went on to say in my post last week, I’m not sug­gest­ing that social media efforts not be mon­i­tored. What I wrote was that […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Media ROI &amp; Unicorn Mortality by Jeff Cann</title>
		<link>http://toderash.net/2011/social-media-roi-unicorn-mortality/comment-page-1/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toderash.net/wp3/?p=1020#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Great post... there is no hard selling in social and as such no hard roi (in most cases)... enjoyed your positioning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post… there is no hard selling in social and as such no hard roi (in most cases)… enjoyed your positioning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advertising Fail by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://toderash.net/2009/advertising-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toderash.net/?p=200#comment-493</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advertising Fail by Ismail</title>
		<link>http://toderash.net/2009/advertising-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toderash.net/?p=200#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Look guys, the billboard isn&#039;t flawed, but the slogan is intact supposed to be like that. It&#039;s just messing about with the words :) &quot;imagine more snacks than you can imagine&quot;, is a clever in the sense that though it doesnt seem clear at first, it is soon visible ad an entertaining phrase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look guys, the billboard isn’t flawed, but the slogan is intact supposed to be like that. It’s just messing about with the words :) “imagine more snacks than you can imagine”, is a clever in the sense that though it doesnt seem clear at first, it is soon visible ad an entertaining phrase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advertising Fail by Funny Inappropriate Ad Slogans &#124; MiffMuff.com</title>
		<link>http://toderash.net/2009/advertising-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Funny Inappropriate Ad Slogans &#124; MiffMuff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toderash.net/?p=200#comment-491</guid>
		<description>[...] Genius. The publicist who wrote this must have been very inspired. Or at least imagined that they were very inspired. (Link) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Genius. The publicist who wrote this must have been very inspired. Or at least imagined that they were very inspired. (Link) […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advertising Fail by Inappropriate hilarious 15 Ad Slogans - Oddee&#039;s Blog Amazing,Weird,Bizarre &#124; Oddee&#039;s Blog Amazing,Weird,Bizarre</title>
		<link>http://toderash.net/2009/advertising-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Inappropriate hilarious 15 Ad Slogans - Oddee&#039;s Blog Amazing,Weird,Bizarre &#124; Oddee&#039;s Blog Amazing,Weird,Bizarre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toderash.net/?p=200#comment-490</guid>
		<description>[...]   (Link)   Sad but true.(Link)      Gee, the journalist who wrote this must have very inspired.(Link)      Worst University ever.(Link)   (Link)   Step very subliminal.   Alzheimer&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…]   (Link)   Sad but true.(Link)      Gee, the journalist who wrote this must have very inspired.(Link)      Worst University ever.(Link)   (Link)   Step very subliminal.   Alzheimer’s […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advertising Fail by 15 Hilariously Inappropriate Ad Slogans</title>
		<link>http://toderash.net/2009/advertising-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>15 Hilariously Inappropriate Ad Slogans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 09:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toderash.net/?p=200#comment-489</guid>
		<description>[...] Gee, the publicist who wrote this must have been very inspired. (Link) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Gee, the publicist who wrote this must have been very inspired. (Link) […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

